Summary

Predicting a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome during telephone evaluation by an emergency dispatcher: the SCARE predictive scale

Guerineau A, Rozelle C, Sevestre E, Narcisse S, Laribi S, Giovannetti O

Affiliation of the authors

Department of Emergency Medicine, CHR Orléans, Orléans, France. Tours University, School of Medicine, and Tours University Hospital, Emergency Medicine Department, Tours, France.

DOI

Quote

Guerineau A, Rozelle C, Sevestre E, Narcisse S, Laribi S, Giovannetti O. Predicting a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome during telephone evaluation by an emergency dispatcher: the SCARE predictive scale. Emergencias. 2020;32:19-25

Summary

Background and objective.

Correctly identifying patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on first contact is essential, yet emergency dispatchers currently lack a risk scale that can help predict an ACS diagnosis. Our main aim was to develop and validate such a risk scale.

Methods.

Prospective, observational single-center study in 2016 (January 1 to December 31). We included patients who called our emergency dispatch center to report nontraumatic chest pain. Included patients were randomly assigned to a development or a validation sample. The predictive SCARE scale was built with logistic regression analysis. Discrimination and calibration were analyzed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Results.

The development sample included 902 patients. The regression model identified 7 variables associated with a final diagnosis of ACS: male sex, age, smoking, typical pain characteristics, first episode of chest pain, diaphoresis, and physician intuition (the teledispatcher’s suspicion). When we applied the scale in the validation sample of 465 patients the area under the curve was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76–0.87). The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was 5.18 (P=.74).

Conclusions.

The SCARE scale had good discrimination and calibration properties. The scale should be further validated in an external sample from a multicenter study before it is implemented by emergency dispatch centers.

 

More articles by the authors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *