Summary
Epidemiologic study of community-acquired pneumonia treated at a tertiary-care hospital: Does Fine’s pneumonia severity index influence decision-making in the emergency department?
Llorens Soriano P, Murcia J, Laghzaoui F, Martínez-Beloqui E, Pastor Cesteros R, Marquina V, Ramos S, Jiménez I, Landete I, Román Cerdá F, Albert-Jiménez A
Affiliation of the authors
Servicio de Urgencias, Unidad de Corta Estancia y Unidad de Hospital a Domicilio. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Spain.
DOI
Quote
Llorens Soriano P, Murcia J, Laghzaoui F, Martínez-Beloqui E, Pastor Cesteros R, Marquina V, et al. Epidemiologic study of community-acquired pneumonia treated at a tertiary-care hospital: Does Fine’s pneumonia severity index influence decision-making in the emergency department?. Emergencias. 2009;21:247-54
Summary
Objectives: To determine the incidence of community-acquired pneumonia and
describe its characteristics. To assess differences influenced by Fine’s pneumonia severity
index.
Methods: Prospective, descriptive study of patients with community-acquired
pneumonia treated over a period of 1 year in the emergency department of Hospital
General Universitario in Alicante, Spain. Social, demographic and clinical variables
(including laboratory, radiologic, and microbiologic data) were collected. Destination on
discharge from the emergency department and patient status at 30 days were recorded.
The pneumonia severity index was determined according to Fine’s prediction rule, and
patients were then classified as being at low ( III) or high (> III) risk. Differences
between the 2 risk classes and the distribution of admissions according to risk were
analyzed.
Results: Five hundred fifty patients with community-acquired pneumonia were included.
The cumulative incidence was 2.2 cases per 1000 patient-years. Patients with
community-acquired pneumonia at high risk had more comorbidity and functional
decline, a higher incidence of respiratory failure, and infiltrates in multiple lobes. An
etiologic diagnosis was established for 209 patients (38%). The most common
microorganism isolated was Streptococcus pneumoniae in all risk classes. The admission
rate was 77.2% (high-risk classes, 99.5%; low-risk, 65.1%). The patients were admitted
to the respiratory medicine department, the short-stay unit, and the internal medicine
department. Risk class influenced patient destination on discharge from the emergency
department.
Conclusions: Patients with community-acquired pneumonia classified as being at high
risk (older patients, with functional decline, comorbidity, multilobar infiltrates, sensory
abnormalities, and elevated lactate levels) are most often admitted to the short-stay unit
and internal medicine department. A large percentage of community-acquired
pneumonia patients in low-risk classes are admitted to hospital.
