Summary
Advanced life support units in Spain: the situation in 2008
Pesqueira Alonso EE, Juliani Izquierdo P
Affiliation of the authors
Inaer. Base HEMS de Ciudad Real, Spain. Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Spain.
DOI
Quote
Pesqueira Alonso EE, Juliani Izquierdo P. Advanced life support units in Spain: the situation in 2008. Emergencias. 2009;21:269-75
Summary
Objective: To determine the number of emergency advanced life support teams
currently operating in Spain, their locations, the proportion of the population served, the
population density, and the territorial extension covered in the different autonomous
communities.
Method: Descriptive study of the Spanish situation as of January 1, 2009. Public
information sources were used to identify the number and locations of advanced life
support teams. The data gathered were complemented with information obtained by
interviewing the staff of hospital emergency departments and dispatch centers. The
concept of advanced life support team was defined and the study was limited to teams
providing initial care. Population and territorial extension data were taken from the latest
official census published by the Spanish National Institute of Statistics in December
2008.
Results: We identified 362 teams meeting the defined criteria; 327 use road transport
ambulances and 35 use helicopter ambulances. We found advanced life support teams
operating at a ratio of 1 to 127 308 inhabitants (0.78/100 000 population), with ratios
varying from 1 to 63 000 (1.58/100 000 population) to 1 to 232 000 (0.43/100 000
population). Geographically, we found 1 team for every 1400 km2 (7.2/10 000 km2) on
the average, with a range of 1 unit for every 129 km2 (77.2/10 000 km2) to 1 unit for
every 5200 km2 (1.9/10 000 km2). Density averaged 12 persons per square kilometer
attended by a unit, with a range in density of 1 to 31 per square kilometer attended.
Conclusions: 1) There is considerable disparity between different Spanish autonomous
communities with regard to use of advanced life support units, the territorial extension
covered, populations served, and density. 2) The differences in coverage by life support
units are unrelated to population, territory, or population density. 3) The differences can
be attributed to disparity in criteria applied when planning and to factors related to
geography and climate, communication infrastructure or other unstudied variab
