Summary
Combined high-sensitivity copeptin and troponin T evaluation for the diagnosis of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department
Alquézar A, Santaló M, Rizzi M, Gich I, Grau M, Sionis A, Ordóñez-Llanos J
Affiliation of the authors
Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Epidemiología Clínica, Hospital Universitario de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Cardiología, Institut d’Investigacions Biomédiques- Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Institut d’Investigacions Biomédiques-Sant Pau Barcelona, Spain. Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Universidad Autónoma, Barcelona, Spain.
DOI
Quote
Alquézar A, Santaló M, Rizzi M, Gich I, Grau M, Sionis A, et al. Combined high-sensitivity copeptin and troponin T evaluation for the diagnosis of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Emergencias. 2017;29:237-44
Summary
Objectives.
the 1-year prognostic utility of these biomarkers in this clinical context.
Material and methods. Retrospective observational study of a series of patients attended for chest pain suggesting myocardial ischemia in 5 Spanish ED. The first blood drawn in the ED was used for hs-copep and hs-cTnt assays, which were processed in a single laboratory serving all centers. Diagnostic utility was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). We also performed a separate analysis with data for the subgroup of patients with early detection of symptoms (3 h of onset of symptoms). We recorded complications, mortality or reinfarction occurring within a year of the index event.
Results.
assay, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86–0.94) for the 2 assays combined. The ROC for the 2 assays combined was not significantly better than the ROC for the hs-cTnt by itself (P=.89). We saw the same pattern of results when we analyzed the subgroup of patients who presented early. Sixty percent of the complications occurred in patients with elevated findings on both assays. Elevated hs-copep findings did not provide prognostic information that was not already provided by hs-cTnt findings (P=.56).
Conclusion. The hs-copep assay does not increase the diagnostic or prognostic yield already provided by the hs-cTnt assay in patients suspected of myocardial infarction in the ED.