Summary
Comparison of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment system versus the Prehospital Advanced Triage Model in multiple-casualty events
Ferrandini Price M, Arcos González P, Pardo Ríos M, Nieto Fernández-Pacheco A, Cuartas Álvarez T, Castro Delgado R
Affiliation of the authors
Urgencias y Emergencias 061 de la Región de Murcia, Spain. Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), Spain. Unidad de Investigación en Emergencia y Desastre, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, España. 4SAMU-Asturias, Spain.
DOI
Quote
Ferrandini Price M, Arcos González P, Pardo Ríos M, Nieto Fernández-Pacheco A, Cuartas Álvarez T, Castro Delgado R. Comparison of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment system versus the Prehospital Advanced Triage Model in multiple-casualty events. Emergencias. 2018;30:224-30
Summary
Objectives.
of treatments.
Methods.
Results.
than in the START arm (41 minutes and 6 seconds [10 minutes, 39 seconds]) (P=.024). Evacuation of the subgroup of patients requiring emergency surgery was also faster in the META arm (24 minutes and 12 seconds [4 minutes] than in
the START arm (44 minutes and 49 seconds [8 minutes, 36 seconds]) (P=.001). Analysis of the order of evacuation under the 2 triage systems revealed that 14 of the first 19 patients evacuated required immediate medical care and 5 of the first 14 evacuated required priority surgical treatment in the START arm. In the META arm, all of the first 14 patients
evacuated required immediate medical care and 5 of the first 7 patients evacuated required priority surgical treatment. The rate of appropriate treatment was 92% in the META arm and 63% in the START arm (P=.023).
Conclusions.
