Summary

Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with acute heart failure

Carratala JM, Díaz Lobato S, Brouzet B, Más-Serrano P, Espinosa B, Llorens P


Affiliation of the authors

Servicio de Urgencias, Unidad de Corta Estancia y Hospitalización a Domicilio, Hospital General de Alicante; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIALFundación FISABIO), Alicante, Spain. Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. Servicio de Farmacia. Hospital General de Alicante; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIALFundación FISABIO), Alicante, Spain. División de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica. Universidad Miguel Hernández. Elche, Alicante, Spain. Grupo Multidisciplinar Español para el Soporte Terapeútico con Terapia de Alto Flujo en Adultos (HISPAFLOW)

DOI

Quote

Carratala JM, Díaz Lobato S, Brouzet B, Más-Serrano P, Espinosa B, Llorens P. Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with acute heart failure. Emergencias. 2018;30:395-9

Summary

Objectives.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in patients in acute respiratory failure due to acute heart failure (AHF) refractory to conventional oxygen therapy or noninvasive ventilation.

Methods.

Prospective observational study of patients with AHF and respiratory failure attended in an emergency department whose condition worsened after they were admitted to a short-stay unit, leading to use of HFNCs. Efficacy was assessed using a modified Borg dyspnea scale and oxygenation variables on discharge from the emergency

department. Data were recorded after 24 hours on conventional oxygen therapy and after 60 and 120 minutes and 24 hours of HFNC therapy. Safety outcomes were the degree of patient comfort and the frequency of adverse events.

Results.

Forty-four patients with a mean (SD) age of 84 (7) years (75% women) were enrolled. Significant improvements were observed after HFNC oxygen therapy (baseline vs 60 and 120 minutes and baseline vs 24 hours) on clinical outcomes and oxygenation as well as decrease in respiratory frequency (P<.05). No significant changes in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood were detected. The most common side effect was feeling too warm (20.4%). Conclusion. HFNC oxygen therapy offers a treatment alternative for patients with acute respiratory failure due to AHF.

 

More articles by the authors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.