Summary
Evaluation of adverse drug reactions in emergency department practice
De Andrés Lázaro AM, Sevilla Sánchez D, Ortega Romero M, Codina Jané C, Ribas Sala J, Sánchez Sánchez M
Affiliation of the authors
Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Farmacia, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Barcelona, Spain. Área de Urgencias, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
DOI
Quote
De Andrés Lázaro AM, Sevilla Sánchez D, Ortega Romero M, Codina Jané C, Ribas Sala J, Sánchez Sánchez M. Evaluation of adverse drug reactions in emergency department practice. Emergencias. 2013;25:361-7
Summary
Objective: To assess the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the emergency
department of a tertiary care hospital, to determine the characteristics of the ADRs, to
identify related risk factors, and to evaluate medication errors associated with
preventable ADRs.
Methods: Descriptive observational study based on data extracted from medical
records. Patients admitted to hospital after attendance in the emergency department
over a 3-month period were included. ADRs were found following a previously
established method to identify ADR clues, or triggers, in patient records. The Karch-
Lasagna scale and the Hallas algorithm were used to evaluate causality, and the
Schumock-Thornton questionnaire was used to assess ADR preventability. All events that
were candidates for classification as ADRs were validated by 2 data collectors.
Results: In the records for the 237 patients included, 31 ADRs were detected (incidence,
13%). Most of the ADRs could be assigned a possible (61%) or probable (29%) cause.
Forty-five percent of the ADRs were caused by medication errors and could have been
prevented. The most common preventable ADRs were hypo- or hyperglycemia related to
antidiabetic medication. The most common errors involved failure to prescribe a
necessary medication (50%) or failure to administer one (21%). The most common
unavoidable ADRs were tachycardia and hyperglycemia related to salbutamol and
corticosteroids, respectively. The only factors associated with a higher prevalence of
ADRs were the number of drugs administered in the emergency department and
admission to the acute-care section of the department.
Conclusions: The incidence of ADRs in this study was high and preventable events were
detected. These findings are consistent with evaluations of ADRs in the hospital setting.
