Summary

Factors related to patients’ perception of feeling safe in pre-hospital emergencies: a multicenter cross-sectional study

Juan-Antonio Péculo-Carrasco1, Hugo-José Rodríguez-Ruiz1, Antonio Puerta-Córdoba1, José-Manuel de la Fuente-Rodríguez2, Mónica Rodríguez-Bouza1, Inmaculada Failde3,4

Affiliation of the authors

1Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Cádiz, Spain. 2Centro Universitario de Enfermería “Salus Infirmorum”, Cádiz, Spain. 3Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Spain. 4Departamento de Biomedicina, Biotecnología y Salud Pública, Universidad de Cádiz, Spain.

DOI

Quote

Péculo-Carrasco JA, Rodríguez-Ruiz HJ, Puerta-Córdoba A, de la Fuente-Rodríguez JM, Rodríguez-Bouza M, Failde I. Factors related to patients’ perception of feeling safein pre-hospital emergencies: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Emergencias. 2023;35:447-55

Summary

Aim. To identify factors related to patients’ feeling of safety during prehospital emergencies.

Methods.

Descriptive, multicenter cross-sectional study in the context of “061” emergency response services of Andalusia, Spain. Data were collected from April 2021 to March 2022. Patients attended and transported by emergency responders were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they were minors or in an altered state of consciousness, or had cognitive impairment or any barrier to communication. We calculated that a minimum sample size of 644 patients would be required. The outcome variable was the score on a 16-item scale of patient-perceived safety (ESP16, as abbreviated in Spanish). Sociodemographic, emergency service response, patient, and hospital transfer variables were studied in relation to ESP16 score. We also collected patient safety incident reports. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze associations between the independent variables and the dependent outcome variable. Guidelines for Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) were followed.

Results.

We received 1756 responses. The mean (SD) ESP16 score was 77.7 (5.6); the median score was 80. The coefficients derived from the linear regression model were as follows for the variables associated with the ESP16 score: 2.799 (P < .001) for satisfaction; –6.097 (P < .001) for incident reports of errors, falls, harm, or injury; –2.742 (P < .001) for reports of any other incident during attendance; 2.538 (P = .001) for use of the transport protocol; 1.157 (P < .001) for type of emergency transport used; 0.726 (P = .014) for a cardiology diagnosis; and 1.195 (P = .003) for pain intensity.

Conclusions.

Patients’ perception of safety is very high, as reflected by level of satisfaction, incident reports, use of a transport protocol, means of transport used, diagnosis, and pain level.

 

More articles by the authors