Summary
Follow-up of a clinical pathway for varicella-zoster virus infection
García-Castrillo Riesgo L, Mariné Blanco M, Martínez Ortiz de Zárate M, Piñera Salmerón P
Affiliation of the authors
Emergency Department. Marqués de Valdecilla Hospital. Santander, Spain. Emergency Department. La Moraleja Hospital. Madrid, Spain. Emergency Department. Basurto Hospital. Bilbao, Spain. Emergency Department. Cieza Hospital. Murcia, Spain.
DOI
Quote
García-Castrillo Riesgo L, Mariné Blanco M, Martínez Ortiz de Zárate M, Piñera Salmerón P. Follow-up of a clinical pathway for varicella-zoster virus infection. Emergencias. 2008;20:87-92
Summary
Background: Evaluation, follow-up and healthcare professional acceptance are critical
issues in the implementation of a clinical pathway (CP).
Aims: To evaluate the performance of a varicella-zoster virus (VZV) pathway in different
Emergency Departments (ED).
Design: Observational prospective multicenter study in 49 EDs (local, reference and intermediate
EDs). The subjects of the study were patients older than 14 years with a clinical
diagnosis of varicella or herpes who were assisted at all EDs during the whole
study period (Feb-Jul 2007). Data on demographic, clinical characteristics and application
of CP were recorded. Acceptance of CP was assessed by survey.
Results: The study included 929 herpes and 427 varicella patients. Our VZV cases had
a higher admission and complication rates than the cases reported on previous publications,
which reflects higher severity. CP recommendations were applied in 75% of varicella
and 85,3% of herpes cases. Reference and local EDs had higher rates of CP application
(95%, 87.7%) than intermediate EDs (72.9%) (P < 0.01). Ninety five percent of responders evaluated information and treatment on CP as “useful or very useful”. The most appreciated feature of CP was information. Conclusions: The level of acceptance of VZV CP is high. The severity of certain cases requires to adjust the recommendations.
