Summary
Hypertension, hypertensive crisis, and hypertensive emergency: approaches to emergency department care
Gómez Angelats E, Bragulat Baur E
Affiliation of the authors
Sección de Urgencias Medicina. Área de Urgencias. Hospital Clínic. Barcelona, Spain.
DOI
Quote
Gómez Angelats E, Bragulat Baur E. Hypertension, hypertensive crisis, and hypertensive emergency: approaches to emergency department care. Emergencias. 2010;22:209-19
Summary
Elevated arterial blood pressure is a frequent reason for seeking emergency care. It is
important to remember that pressure elevation alone does not define whether the
situation should be considered a life-threatening emergency or denotes only a need for
urgent attention. Rather, it is the signs and symptoms accompanying the elevation that
will reveal which patients are in need of emergency treatment. A hypertensive emergency
is characterized by clear signs of acute injury to a target organ, presenting as hypertensive
encephalopathy, intracranial bleeding, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure with acute
pulmonary edema, aortic dissection, eclampsia or preeclampsia, or accelerated
hypertension. These situations require the immediate but not abrupt reduction of arterial
pressures by means of parenteral administration of drugs. A hypertensive patient in need
of urgent care, but not in an emergency situation, on the other hand, has seriously
elevated pressures but no signs of acute or progressive target organ injury. Such a patient
requires gradual reduction of pressures over a period of 24 hours to several days and can
receive oral treatment. A large number of drugs are available for managing hypertension.
No single drug has been reliably shown to be better than others at reducing pressures,
whether administered parenterally or not. However, recommendations can be made
based on the accompanying clinical picture and individual patient characteristics. This
review will outline such recommendations.
