Summary

Impact on safety and cost of pharmaceutical interventions in the emergency department (INTERPHAR): a standardized methodology for multicenter documentation

Javier Ramos-Rodríguez1,2, Manuel Bonete-Sánchez1,3, Jesús Ruíz-Ramos1,4, Beatriz Calderón-Hernanz1,5, Ainara Campino-Villegas1,6, Ana de Lorenzo-Pinto1,7, Milagros García-Peláez1,8, María del Mar García-Gutiérrez1,9, Ángeles García-Martín1,10, José Manuel Real-Campaña1,11, Ana Ginés-Palomares1,12, Ana Such-Díaz1,13, Emili Vallvé-Alcón1,14, Héctor Alonso-Ramos1,15, en representación del Grupo de trabajo de Atención Farmacéutica en Urgencias de la SEFH (REDFASTER)


Affiliation of the authors

1Grupo de trabajo de Atención Farmacéutica en Urgencias de la SEFH (REDFASTER). 2Corporació Sanitaria Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. 3Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Spain. 4Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. 5Hospital Universitari Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 6Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain. 7Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 8Hospital Asepeyo, Sant Cugat, Barcelona, Spain. 9Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain. 10Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. 11Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain. 12Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Madrid, Spain. 13Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain. 14Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. 15Hospital Universitario Dr.Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

DOI

Quote

Ramos-Rodríguez J, Bonete-Sánchez M, Ruíz-Ramos J, Calderón-Hernanz B, Campino-Villegas A, de Lorenzo-Pinto A, et al. Impact on safety and cost of pharmaceutical interventions in the emergency department (INTERPHAR): a standardized methodology for multicenter documentation. Emergencias. 2025;37:367-72

Summary

Objectives.

To design a standardized methodology for documenting pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) in hospital emergency departments (EDs), to identify the clinical situations in which they are most frequently performed, and evaluate their economic impact.

Methods.

We conducted a multicenter, observational, prospective study of PIs over a 2-month period (from April 12th through June 11th, 2021). A total of 36 types of PIs were identified and grouped into 5 categories: prevention of medication-related adverse events, resource utilization, individualized care, direct patient care, and administrative or support tasks. Clinical impact was evaluated using the GRADE system, based on the level of evidence and strength of recommendation for each intervention. Economic impact was calculated from the potential cost avoided by each PI.

Results.

A total of 46 hospital pharmacists from 38 hospitals in Spain and Portugal participated, performing 5,667 PIs. Of these, 86.6% (4,907) were accepted and 95.3% (5,402) were proactive. By category, 36.5% (2,068) corresponded to administrative tasks, 35.9% (2,035) to
individualized care, 22.4% (1,269) to adverse event prevention, 2.4% (135) to direct patient care, and 1.3% (75) to resource
optimization; 1.5% (85) were not classifiable. Overall, 94.5% of PIs had a level of evidence III, 4.2% level IV, 1.2% level Ib, and 0.1% level IIa. The potential cost avoided amounted to €1,984,474.90.

Conclusions.

The implementation of a standardized documentation methodology in EDs across Spain and Portugal highlights the value of clinical pharmacy in optimizing pharmacotherapy, supporting the care team, and reducing health care costs.

 

More articles by the authors

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.