Summary

Redesign of telephone triage for non-traumatic chest pain using deterministic rules derived through machine learning: development and temporal validation

Carlos Romero-Olóriz1, María José Luque-Hernández1, Álvaro Ritoré-Hidalgo1-3, Cristina López-López1, Ángel Serrano-Alarcón1-3, Miguel Ángel Armengol de La Hoz3


Affiliation of the authors

1Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061 (CES-061) de Andalucía, Campanillas, Málaga, Spain. 2Ibima Plataforma Bionand, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Málaga, Spain. 3Laboratorio de Ciencia de Datos, Fundación Progreso y Salud, Sevilla, Spain.

DOI

Quote

Romero-Olóriz C, Luque-Hernández MJ, Ritoré-Hidalgo A, López-López C, Serrano-Alarcón A, Armengol de La Hoz MA. Redesign of telephone triage for non-traumatic chest pain using deterministic rules derived through machine learning: development and temporal validation. Emergencias. 2026;38:405-15

Summary

Objective.

To develop and validate a telephone triage system based on deterministic rules and dichotomous questions for non-traumatic chest pain, aimed at reducing undertriage and the sex-related diagnostic gap.

Method.

Retrospective observational study conducted at the Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061 de Andalucía (Andalusia, Spain). A total of 66,384 calls triaged using the current structured guideline (GTTA23) were included, with the prehospital clinical diagnosis used as the reference standard. The multiple-choice questions were recoded into 36 dichotomous variables. Using gradient boosting, we derived 15 emergency rules (P1, immediate advanced life support) and 8 non-emergency rules (NO-P1, deferrable cases); the remaining cases were referred for coordinator review (ESC). The development cohort comprised 53,323 episodes recorded between 2020 and 2023, and the validation cohort comprised 13,061 episodes recorded in 2024. We followed the TRIPOD+AI and SAGER guidelines.

Results.

In the validation cohort, system sensitivity (P1 ø ESC vs NO-P1) was 97.8% (95% CI, 96.96–98.42), compared with 74.0% for the current system (D = +23.82 percentage points; P < .0001). Undertriage dropped from 6.7% down to 4.0%, and the number of false negatives decreased from 415 to 35. The gap between the sexes decreased from 16.09 to 6.24 percentage points (DD = −9.85 percentage points; P = .0005). The system reduced immediate advanced life support dispatch from 52.8% to 28.5%; 35.2% of cases were resolved deterministically, while 64.8% were referred to the coordinator.

Conclusions.

The system reduces undertriage to < 5% and attenuates the sex-related diagnostic gap while preserving transparency and interpretability. Its impact on workload, coordination times, and resource use requires prospective validation.

 

More articles by the authors

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.