Summary
Turfing in the emergency department
Martin Schilling U
Affiliation of the authors
Division of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Accidents and Emergencies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Emergency Clinic, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Suecia.
DOI
Quote
Martin Schilling U. Turfing in the emergency department. Emergencias. 2014;26:129-32
Summary
Background and objective: Turfing, defined as finding any excuse to refer a patient to a
different department or team, is commonly done to avoid patient admission. Research on
turfing is limited, and the practice is rarely spoken about. The author has sometimes
experienced difficulty obtaining radiology images because of a stringent policy of avoiding
doing such tests out of regular office hours. I suspected that physicians may present
patients symptoms in ways that imply certain medical conditions, in other words to
optimize the patient according to the criteria needed for the investigation asked for. In
this study, I explored the presence and extent of turfing and optimizing in a Swedish
emergency department (ED).
Method: The emergency physicians (EP) at a tertiary care university hospital were
invited to participate in an anonymous intranet-based survey. Demographic data
collected were the physicians total experience (years), the total number of patients
treated, and the experience within the present hospital (years). The EP were asked about
their experience of turfing and optimizing and the percentage of patients to whom these
practices were applied. The respondents were also asked how they viewed turfing and
optimizing and how they thought these practices affected ED wait times.
Results: Responses were received from 18 EP with a mean (SD) of 11.5 (8.48) years of
total experience and of 4.4 (3.73) years in the present hospital (62% response rate). The
majority had treated more than 5000 patients. All respondents confirmed the practice of
turfing, and it was estimated that turfing was used in 17.34% (13.08%) of all patients
(range, 2%50%). Seventeen of the 18 respondents felt obliged to optimize patients to
get tests performed, estimating that 23.23% (22.97%) of their patients were affected
(range, 5%-80%). Twelve regarded turfing and optimizing to be unsafe and 17 believed
that these practices influenced ED wait times.
Conclusion: Turfing and optimizing, affecting approximately 1 in 5 emergency patients
in this setting, seem to be major problems for the surveyed Swedish EP.
