Summary

Ultrasound imaging obtained by emergency department physicians to diagnose deep vein thrombosis: accuracy, safety, and efficiency

Jiménez Hernández S, Ruiz-Artacho P, Maza Vera MT, Ortiz Villacian E, Chehayeb J, Campo Linares R, Millán Soria J, Alonso Viladot JR, Nogué Bou R


Affiliation of the authors

Área de Urgencias, Hospital Clínic, Grupo UPyP, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISCC, Madrid, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital de Donosti, Donosti, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Clínico de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital de Santa Bárbara, Puertollano, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain. Área de Urgencias/Cuidados Intermedios, Hospital Vithas Montserrat, Lleida, Spain.

DOI

Quote

Jiménez Hernández S, Ruiz-Artacho P, Maza Vera MT, Ortiz Villacian E, Chehayeb J, Campo Linares R, et al. Ultrasound imaging obtained by emergency department physicians to diagnose deep vein thrombosis: accuracy, safety, and efficiency. Emergencias. 2019;31:167-72

Summary

Objective.

To assess the accuracy, safety, and efficiency of ultrasound images obtained by emergency physicians to diagnose deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Methods.

Prospective multicenter cohort study. We assigned patients suspected of having DVT to an intervention or control group. Emergency physicians took ultrasound images that were later evaluated by a radiologist in the intervention group. In the control group, images were evaluated only by the radiologist. We analyzed patient, physician, and episode

variables. Test results, times until imaging, and 30-day adverse events were also analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and agreement between physicians and radiologists (κ statistic) were calculated.

Results.

A total of 304 patients (209 in the intervention group and 95 controls) were included. The groups were comparable. The overall prevalence of DVT was 35.5% (95% CI, 30.3–41.0). The sensitivity of ultrasound images obtained by emergency physicians was superior in relation to experience: 71.4 (95% CI, 50.0–86.0) for those in a training course, 75.0 (95% CI, 80.0–95.4) for those with at least 2 months’ practical experience, and 94.7 (95% CI, 82.7–98.5) for routine users. Specificity statistics for the 3 levels of physician experience were 83.3 (95% CI 55.2–95.2), 100 (95% CI 83.0–100), and 96.6 (95% CI 88.4–99.0), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios for ultrasound imaging by physicians were 27.94 and 0.054, respectively. The κ statistic was 0.80. Mean (SD) time

until a physician took ultrasound images was 1.81 (1.46) hours versus 4.39 (1.81) hours until a radiologist obtained images (P = .007). Three deaths occurred within 30 days. They were not attributable to recurrence or bleeding.

Conclusions.

Ultrasound images taken by emergency physicians to diagnose DVT are accurate and safe and may be efficient. However, routine experience with ultrasound is necessary.

 

More articles by the authors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.