Summary
Evolution of different bibliometric and quality markers of the journal EMERGENCIAS between 2005 and 2009, and comparison with those of the same specialty included in Journal Citation Reports
Miró O, Martín-Sánchez FJ, Burillo-Putze G, Julián Jiménez A, Tomás Vecina S, Pacheco A, Sánchez M
Affiliation of the authors
EMERGENCIAS Editorial Board. Spain.
DOI
Quote
Miró O, Martín-Sánchez FJ, Burillo-Putze G, Julián Jiménez A, Tomás Vecina S, Pacheco A, et al. Evolution of different bibliometric and quality markers of the journal EMERGENCIAS between 2005 and 2009, and comparison with those of the same specialty included in Journal Citation Reports. Emergencias. 2010;22:165-74
Summary
Objectives: To calculate 5-year (2005-2009) quality and bibliometric indicators for
Emergencias and compare them to those of other journals specialized in emergency
medicine.
Methods: Manual review of articles published in Emergencias and consultation of the Web
of Science (WoS) database to record the following information for other journals for each
year of the study period: number and type of articles published; number, nationality,
professional affiliation, and academic degrees of authors; number and type of cites; and
cites in both WoS-indexed journals and in Emergencias (self-citation). The self-citation rates,
immediacy indices, and impact factors were calculated for Emergencias and compared with
those of the 13 emergency medicine journals listed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR).
Results: The number of manuscripts received by Emergencias increased significantly by
157%, going from 102 in 2005 to 262 in 2009. The total number of articles published
increased from 87 to 128 (47%), while the number of original research articles grew
from 26 to 43 (65%). The percentage of articles by non-Spanish authors also rose, from
2.3% to 10.2%, an increase of 335%. The number of cites rose from 12 to 117 (875%
increase). The acceptance rate decreased significantly by 40%, going from 81% to 49%.
Reviewer response time was also cut, by 53%, going from 55 to 26 days. Editorial
decision time decreased from 142 to 62 days (reduction of 56%). The self-citation rate
decreased significantly, descending to 43% in 2009, while the immediacy index
increased to 0.16 in 2006 (0.689, counting self-citation). The impact factor excluding
self-citation was 0.816 in 2009 (1.437, counting self-citation). Most of these indicators
are within the range of the 13 comparable journals listed in the JCR in 2008.
Conclusion: Emergencias has undergone highly favorable changes over the past 5 years,
improving many of the main quality and bibliometric indicators. At the end of the study
period the statistics for Emergencias were within the range calculated for emergency
medicine journals in the JCR.
