Summary

Management of status epilepticus in the emergency department: Systematic review and clinical update

Raúl Alonso Avilés1,2, Cesáreo Fernández Alonso3, Félix González Martínez4, Manuel Liñán López5, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de NeuroSEMES


Affiliation of the authors

1Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain. 2Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Valladolid (IBIoVALL), Valladolid, Spain. 3Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. 4Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, Cuenca, Spain. 5Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.

DOI

Quote

Alonso Avilés R, Fernández Alonso C, González Martínez F, Liñán López M, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de NeuroSEMES. Management of status epilepticus in the emergency department: Systematic review and clinical update. Emergencias. 2026;38:200-8

Summary

Objective.

To update the available evidence on the management of all types of status epilepticus (SE) in hospital emergency departments (EDs) and prehospital emergency medical services (EMS).

Methods.

We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 methodology. A comprehensive search was conducted across biomedical databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Spanish databases) from January 2015 through October 2025. Studies on treatment, validated prognostic scales, and multicenter registries of convulsive and nonconvulsive SE were included. Quality assessment was performed using GRADE and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Results.

A total of 47 studies were included. Benzodiazepines remain the first-line therapy (high certainty of evidence, GRADE). As second-line therapy, levetiracetam, phenytoin, and valproate showed comparable efficacy (50–60%; moderate certainty). The ESETT trial demonstrated no superiority among second-line antiseizure drugs. Spanish evidence includes the ACESUR Registry (664 patients) and the validated RACESUR (AUC 0.72) and ADAN scales (predictive accuracy 90.9%; 95% CI, 88.4–93.4), providing context-specific evidence for the Spanish healthcare system.

Conclusions.

SE management requires rapid sequential treatment with benzodiazepines followed by second-line antiseizure drugs. Comparable efficacy among second-line options allows individualized treatment. The Spanish RACESUR and ADAN scales are validated tools that facilitate risk stratification in emergency settings.

 

More articles by the authors

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.