Summary
Prehospital emergency care of patients with acute heart failure in Spain: the SEMICA study (Emergency Medical Response Systems for Patients with Acute Heart Failure)
Miró O, Llorens P, Escalada X, Herrero P, Jacob J, Gil V, Xipell C, Sánchez C, Aguiló S, Martín-Sánchez FJ
Affiliation of the authors
Area de Urgencias, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona; Grupo de Investigación “Urgencias: Procesos y Patologías”, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. Universidad de Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Unidad de Corta Estancia y Hospitalización a Domicilio, Hospital General de Alicante; Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIALFundación FISABIO), Alicante, Spain. Sistema de Emergències Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
DOI
Quote
Miró O, Llorens P, Escalada X, Herrero P, Jacob J, Gil V, et al. Prehospital emergency care of patients with acute heart failure in Spain: the SEMICA study (Emergency Medical Response Systems for Patients with Acute Heart Failure). Emergencias. 2017;29:223-30
Summary
Objectives.
Methods.
administered before arrival at the hospital. Twenty-seven independent variables potentially related to type of transport used were also studied. Indicators of AHF severity were triage level assigned in the ED, need for admission, need for intensive care, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality.
Results.
restlessness, and high temperature; it was inversely associated with a history of falls. The rates of receipt of prehospital treatments and AHF severity level increased with use of MAs vs. NMAs vs. PV. Seventy-three percent of patients transported in MAs received oxygen, 29% received a diuretic, 13.5% a vasodilator, and 4.7% noninvasive ventilation.
Conclusions.
