Summary

Progression of emergency obstetric care for unplanned out-of-hospital births: contributions from a 13-year prospective multicenter study in France

Charlène Duchanois1, Cédric Laurent2, Kévin Duarte3, François Javaudin4, Philippe Pes4,5, Agnès Ricard-Hibon6, Thomas Bizouard7, Nicolas Bounaud8, Olivier Morel9, Tahar Chouihed1,3, en representación de AIE Group Investigators


Affiliation of the authors

1Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Nancy, INSERM, UMR_S 1116, DCAC, Nancy, France. 2CNRS UMR 7239 LEM3, University Hospital Nancy, Nancy, France. 3INSERM U1433, CIC-P, Nancy University Hospital Nancy, Nancy, France. 4Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Nantes, CHU Nantes, France. 5Medical informatics department, University Hospital Nantes, CHU Nantes, France. 6Department of Emergency Medicine, SAMU 95-Pontoise General Hospital, Pontoise, Francia. 7Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Angers, France. 8Department of Emergency Medicine, Carcassonne, ORU Occitanie, France. 9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Nancy, INSERM U1254, IADI, Nancy, France.

DOI

Quote

Duchanois C, Laurent C, Duarte K, Javaudin F, Pes P, Ricard-Hibon A, et al. Progression of emergency obstetric care for unplanned out-of-hospital births: contributions from a 13-year prospective multicenter study in France. Emergencias. 2026;38:347-58

Summary

Objectives.

To describe temporal trends in prehospital obstetric care for unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHBs), assess adherence to clinical practice guidelines, and identify areas for improvement in training and health care organization.

Methods.

We conducted a retrospective analysis using prospectively collected data from the French UOHB registry. A total of 3,473 births attended between October 2011 and June 2024 by 79 Emergency Medical Services centers were included. We analyzed temporal trends in maternal characteristics, modes of delivery, prehospital obstetric and neonatal care, and the main care-related time intervals.

Results.

Significant increases were observed in the interval from the call to the dispatch center to the arrival of the medical team (P = .01) and in the time from delivery to placental expulsion (P < .01). The use of prophylactic oxytocin for active management of placental delivery increased (P = .01). By contrast, neonatal blood glucose measurement (P = .01) and routine nasopharyngeal suctioning (P < .01) decreased. In neonatal care, in situ temperature measurement decreased (P < .01). The use of caps, polyethylene bags, and blankets decreased, whereas skin-to-skin contact and incubator use during transport increased. The proportion of newborns who received no thermal protection measures increased (P = .045).

Conclusions.

Periodic dissemination of clinical practice guidelines has been associated with relevant changes in prehospital practice and greater adherence to recommendations. Nevertheless, important challenges remain, including increased response times, the need to consolidate the systematic use of prophylactic oxytocin, and effective prevention of neonatal hypothermia.

 

More articles by the authors

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.