Summary

Safety and efficacy of electric cardioversion in the emergency department: analysis of associated factors according to gender

Natalia Miota Hernández1, Naila Canadell Marcos1, Ana Garcia-Martínez1-3, Cristina del Olmo Vargas1, Marta Massó Muratel1, Ester Miravalles Fernández1, Carolina Sánchez Marcos1, Laia Sentís Virgili1, Joan Batista Valencia Molina5, Blanca Coll-Vinent Puig1-4

Affiliation of the authors

1Área de Urgencias, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Spain. 2Grup de Recerca Urgències, Processos i Patologies, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS). 3Unitat de Fibril·lació Auricular, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Spain. 4Grupo de Arritmias y Síncope. Sociedad Española de Urgencias y Emergencias. 5Área de Urgencias, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.

DOI

Quote

Miota Hernández N, Canadell Marcos N, Garcia-Martínez A, del Olmo Vargas C, Massó Muratel M, Miravalles Fernández E, et al. Safety and efficacy of electric cardioversion in the emergency department: analysis of associated factors according to gender. Emergencias. 2024;36:263-70

Summary

Objective.

To explore the safety and effectiveness of electric cardioversion to treat atrial fibrillation in a hospital emergency department (ED).

Methods.

Retrospective observational study in a hospital ED. We reviewed episodes of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 18 years orolder treated with cardioversion in our ED or referred for scheduling of cardioversion. Clinical outcome measures were conversion to sinus rhythm, immediate adverse effects (hypotension, arrythmia, or bronchial aspiration), revisiting within 90 days for atrial fibrillation, and complications (stroke, major bleeding, heart failure, or death). We studied factors associated with recurrence and adverse effects according to sex.

Results.

Cardioversion was used in 365 episodes (median patient age, 67 years); 38.6% were women. Cardioversion was applied in the ED in 75.1% of the episodes, and 24.9% were referred for scheduled cardioversion. Sinus rhythm was restored in 90.7% of the episodes. Emergency cardioversion was more effective than a scheduled procedure (odds ratio [OR], 4.258; 95% CI, 2.046-8.859; P < .001). No serious immediate adverse effects were reported, but 16.7% of the patients revisited for atrial fibrillation within 90 days. Factors associated with revisits were heart failure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.603; 95% CI, 1.298-5.222; P = .007), sleep apnea (HR, 2.598; 95% CI, 1.163-5.803; P = .020), and, in women, hypertension (HR, 3.706; 95% CI, 1.051-13.068; P = .042). Eleven patients developed late adverse events, including stroke (n = 2), major bleeding (n = 1), heart failure (n = 5), and death (n = 3).
Conclusion. Cardioversion is a useful, effective, and safe treatment for atrial fibrillation in the ED, although there are frequent recurrences. Factors associated with recurrence differ according to sex.

 

More articles by the authors

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.