Summary
The management of severe trauma patients in the autonomous community of Valencia
Mínguez Platero J, García Bermejo P, Ruiz López JL, Millán Soria J
Affiliation of the authors
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. HOSPITAL DE LA RIBERA. VALENCIA.
DOI
Quote
Mínguez Platero J, García Bermejo P, Ruiz López JL, Millán Soria J. The management of severe trauma patients in the autonomous community of Valencia. Emergencias. 2007;19:195-200
Summary
Background and aims: Traumatisms represent in our times the leading
cause of death during the first four decades of life. Without
belittling the importance of an effective prevention policy, there is a
need to guarantee the adequate management and therapy of these patients.
We review the current management of the critical patient and study
the possibilities of improvement whenever needed and wherever possible.
Methods: Multicenter study encompassing all the hospitals in the Valencia
Community. A closed-question survey questionnaire was prepared regarding
the attention to critical patients, which was mailed to the various
hospitalary Emergency Departments. Data acquisition and processing
was carried out using statistical models with assessment of the results.
Results: An admission registry for severe trauma cases is available in
61% of the Emergency Departments in the Valencia Community. The
greatest number of polytraumatism cases corresponds to traffic accidents
(40%). In 61% of the centres surveyed it is the Emergency Physician
who is responsible for the observation and evolutive control of the
cases. Among the Emergency Departments surveyed 33% did not have,
within their own sutructural unit, a capability for attending to multiple victims
at risk of death. As regards material and equipment availability,
23.8% of the hospital Emergency Departments did not have available,
at the time of the survey, a Philadelphia neck support. In 85% of the
surveyed Departments blood counts, blood biochemistries and coagulation
tests are routinely requested on admission, while only one-quarter
does request toxicologic tests per protocol (with a positivity rate of 25-
50%). X-ray examinations are protocolised in over 90% of the surveyed
Departments. As for the planification of training for the professionals in
the Emergency Departments, frequent training and/or update courses
are carried out in 15% of the centres, while 90% of all hospitalary centres
surveyed are accredited for docency by the Ministry of Health and
Consumer Affairs at the present time.
Conclusions: Even though the role of the hospital Emergency Departments
in the integrated plan for care to the polytraumatised patient is
evident, our study has detected an appreciable lack of coordination in
the hospital admission of the polytraumatised patient, with a lack of assistential
uniformity in the initial assessment and management when the various participating centres are compared.
