Summary
Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults: a Cochrane review
Masafumi Tada1,2, Naoki Yamada3, Takashi Matsumoto4, Chikashi Takeda5, Toshi A Furukawa1, Norio Watanabe6
Affiliation of the authors
1Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan. 2Department of Neurology, Emergency Medicine, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan. 3Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan. 4Department of Intensive Care, Nakagami Hospital, Okinawa, Japan. 5Department of Anesthesia, Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan. 6Department of Psychiatry, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
DOI
Quote
Tada M, Yamada N, Matsumoto T, Takeda C, Furukawa TA, Watanabe N. Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults: a Cochrane review. Emergencias. 2024;36:460-2